Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Tue109 2018

Last update19:14 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Opinions > MB Opinions
MB responds to Marc Lynch’s Memo Published in Foreign Policy
MB responds to Marc Lynch’s Memo Published in Foreign Policy
In his memo, Lynch urges Akef to “use your political capital” and remain committed to democratic processes. But I feel that our commitment to democracy should not be the real concern of Western intellectuals and policymakers; Our belief in democratic processes is ideological, not tactical. The real concern should be the negative impact of government crackdowns on moderates and the entire democratic process in the Middle East.
Monday, October 22,2007 14:33
by Dr.Ahmad Fahmy Foreign Policy

I read with great interest Marc Lynch’s memo to Muslim Brotherhood’s Chairman Mohammed Mahdi Akef (“Brothers in Arms,” September/October 2007). I believe that this memo should have been written not only to the chairman but to all brotherhood members, as the Muslim Brotherhood is a democratic body whose decisions are always made after proper consultations within its elected institutions.

In his memo, Lynch urges Akef to “use your political capital” and remain committed to democratic processes. But I feel that our commitment to democracy should not be the real concern of Western intellectuals and policymakers; Our belief in democratic processes is ideological, not tactical. The real concern should be the negative impact of government crackdowns on moderates and the entire democratic process in the Middle East. The Muslim Brotherhood is a moderate, mainstream movement that is capable of overshadowing radical ideologies, yet we are only able to do so effectively in an atmosphere of freedom.

Lynch advises Akef to “watch what you say.” I may have to partially agree with him on that. Although Akef’s aim is winning the hearts of many Muslims with a war of words, diverting them from radicalism, I believe that winning peace in the world is a higher moral objective. The brotherhood is playing a unique role in the world today. It acts as a safety valve—and sometimes the valve needs to release excess pressure to avoid explosion.

The Muslim Brotherhood is a large organization representing a reformist school of thought. During its historical journey, different lines of thought have influenced the organization, enriching it by adding diverse ideas and opinions. It is therefore natural that some of the group’s leaders and members are more moderate and tolerant than others. Some are more pragmatic and more willing to engage in dialogue than others. But it has become increasingly clear over the past couple of years that the Egyptian regime has taken a ruthless stance against those moderate leaders.

Dialogue between moderate Islamists and the rest of the world would threaten the very existence of the authoritarian Egyptian regime. The regime seeks international support for its oppression by portraying us as radicals, terrorists, or theocrats. It is only through dialogue where such claims can be proven groundless. Therefore, the regime has tried to prevent such dialogue from taking place by keeping the moderate leaders of the brotherhood, such as Deputy Chairman Khayrat El Shater, behind bars, by resorting to illegal measures, and by engaging in a deceptive smear campaign against the movement and its leadership.

A. Fahmy

Leading member of the Muslim Brotherhood

Chief Executive Officer

IkhwanWeb, the voice of Ikhwan in English

Cairo, Egypt

Related Topics:

Engaging the Muslim Brotherhood
The FP Memo: Brothers in Arms author Marc Lynch gets hit from all sides as A. Fahmy, Joshua A. Stacher, and Martin Kramer air their thoughts on Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood.

Engaging the Muslim Brotherhood Dr.Ahmad Fahmy Size
Engaging the Muslim Brotherhood 2 Dr.Ahmad Fahmy Size

tags: Democratic / Foreign Policy / policymakers / Khayrat El Shater
Posted in MB Opinions , Editorial , MB and West , MB VS. Qaeda  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Related Articles
Letters: Engaging the Muslim Brotherhood
Doing dialogue in Cairo
The moderate behind bars
Do not undermine moderate Islamists: The case of Muslim Brotherhood leader, Khayrat El-Shater
Engaged to Hamas
Memo to the MB: How to talk to America?
Marc Lynch:Let the Great Muslim Brotherhood Debate continue!
To Engage or Not to Engage?
Hamas Calls for Dialogue
Will Hamas moderate?
MB poll: Majority thinks Brotherhood is moderate
We Must Engage With Moderate Muslims
Political Islam: Ready for Engagement?
Engaging Moderate Muslims—Really?
Hamas is being punished for moderate behavior
Good Muslim, Bad Muslim, Moderate Muslim?
Moderate Reformists’ Political View in Mauritanian Vote
These Moderates Are in Fact Fanatics, Torturers and Killers
Let’s Hear It for the Moderates
Engagement or Quarantine: How to Deal with the Islamist Advance
The Moderate Muslim Brotherhood
Is the Muslim Brotherhood Moderate or Radical?
View from Dubai: Why the West must engage Islamists
Essam El-Erian: Dialogue Is A Foundation of Our Movement
Finding the moderates
Moderation Despite the RAND Corporation!
Six Questions for Marc Lynch on Iraq, the “Surge,” and Al Qaeda
Dialogues of Companions
US Considering Engaging Muslim Brothers?
Should the West dialogue with Islamists?
Is the Muslim Brotherhood Moderate?
Engaging Political Islam to Promote Democracy
Clark, Ridley: MB Trial Part of War Against Moderate Islam
Katatny: Dialogue Between Islamists And The West a Necessity
Dialogue manifisto Between Islamists And The West
Building Moderate Muslim Networks
The Debate About The Moderate Muslim Brotherhood Continues