Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Tue109 2018

Last update19:14 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Issues > Election Coverage
Popular Dictators: Who Could Pass the Democratic Test?
Popular Dictators: Who Could Pass the Democratic Test?
Some call Putin a dictator, yet few deny that he would win a fair election. If you look around the world, how many bona fide dictators could say the same?
Monday, December 10,2007 12:58
by Bryan Caplan Econlog.Econlib.org

Some call Putin a dictator, yet few deny that he would win a fair election. If you look around the world, how many bona fide dictators could say the same? Let"s start with:

Castro
Kim Jong Il
Mugabe
Mubarak
The Communist Party in China

Give me your predictions: What vote share would they get?

OK, here"s the next question: What do the electable dictators have in common? Some leading candidates:

1. The electable dictators deliver peace and prosperity. This is a common explanation for Putin"s popularity. It would also presumably predict that the Chinese Communist Party has little to fear from democracy.

2. The electable dictators give the people the policies they want. Rational choice theorists might assume this just re-states #1, but they"re wrong. War-mongering and scapegoating are often popular; so are wealth-destroying economic policies. Mubarak has given Egypt peace, but most Egyptians I"ve talked to tell me that free elections would put bloody-minded Islamists in power. (Aside: Here"s my forthcoming paper about the mechanisms that lead dictators to heed their subjects" wishes).

3. The electable dictators are the best brain-washers. Would Kim Jong Il suffer a crushing defeat, or an overwhelming victory? It"s a tough question. But if you think that a man who rattled nuclear sabers while his people starved en masse might win a free election, it says volumes about political man.

4. Alternative theories? Please share.

It might surprise you, but even I think there is a lot of truth in #1. Democracy yields a lot of disappointing results, but it rarely rewards leaders for sharp declines in living standards or drawn-out wars.

At the same time, #2 is also a big part of the story: At least since the dawn of modern communications, successful dictators are usually demagogues.

As for #3, I see a lot of variation. In the 20s and 30s, Communist propaganda moved the souls of millions; but by the 70s it was a giant waste of rubles. If I had to bet, I"d say that despite all the juche propaganda, North Koreans would throw Kim Jong Il out on his ear. The real challenge would be to convince the voters that after sixty years of terror, it was finally safe to say no to famine.

Gordon Tullock has often wisely remarked that social scientists spend little time studying dictatorship even though it has almost always been the predominant form of government. If we can answer my questions here, I think we will have learned some deep lessons about not only dictatorship, but democracy, and human nature itself.


Posted in Election Coverage  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Related Articles
Moderate Islamists and peaceful democracy
Bush’s love of dictator troubling
UK Conference: Only Solution for Egypt’s Democracy Crisis is MB Participation
Home Thought on Islam and Democracy
Undermining Democracy in the Middle East
Democracy in the Middle East: A Dangerous Idea?
Alberto Gonzales and Coup Against Democracy
Akef: Dictatorship is the cause of the Distress Egyptians are Suffering From
Lessons In Dictatorship
6. Arab Dictators
Islam vs. Dictatorship
The desecration of democracy
Egypt—Don’t Give Up on Democracy Promotion
DEMOCRACY OR WHAT ?
Team Of Next Egyptian Dictator