Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Tue109 2018

Last update19:14 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
US/INTERNATIONAL: Dialogue with Islamists
President George Bush yesterday characterised "negotiation with terrorists and radicals" as "appeasement" during a speech to the Israeli Knesset. Despite Bush’s reluctance, the debate over whether and how to engage in dialogue with armed Islamist groups is raging within both Middle Eastern and Western capitals.
Sunday, May 25,2008 17:44
by Oxford Analytica IHT

President George Bush yesterday characterised "negotiation with terrorists and radicals" as "appeasement" during a speech to the Israeli Knesset. Despite Bush"s reluctance, the debate over whether and how to engage in dialogue with armed Islamist groups is raging within both Middle Eastern and Western capitals.

In much of the West, there is a great reluctance to consider negotiations with the enemy in the "war on terror". These antagonists are usually loosely described as "Islamists" -- a catchall term used to encompass diverse networks of people with strong religious goals and political ambitions. They range from organised political parties that may have armed wings, to nihilistic groups such as al-Qaida, which have fairly nebulous political objectives.

As Islamists continue to compete for political power within Muslim states, the West may be forced to accept their legitimacy as political actors -- if not their terrorist tactics -- and engage in dialogue. Isolating Hizbollah and the Muslim Brotherhood has been particularly difficult because both groups are viewed as legitimate political parties in some Western countries. For example, in Belgium, Hizbollah meets with state officials. Other European countries have not designated it as a terrorist organisation, and Hezbollah remains absent from the EU"s list of banned terror groups. On the other hand, the US policy precludes engagement with most Islamists for fear of promoting the growth of such groups across the Middle East -- a development that would presumably threaten US national security. This explains Washington"s rejection of Hamas, despite its victory in the January 2006 Palestinian elections. Washington and other Western governments (including the EU) refuse to directly engage with Hamas, working through interlocutors such as Egypt when necessary. This has prevented the organisation from operating as the Palestinian National Authority Government, although it has not prevented Hamas from seizing de facto control of Gaza or diminished its political appeal; opinion polls suggest that it may have had the opposite effect. Engagement with Islamist groups is fraught with dangers and potential drawbacks, and can risk empowering them. However, attempted isolation may be even less effective, particularly given inevitable Western divisions. For, absent diplomatic feelers it is difficult to properly assess the nature of the threat posed by the enemy"s goals, intentions, and long-term objectives.

Counter-intuitively, defusing Islamist terrorism may, in part, involve allowing such groups to contribute to the flow of ideas and politics of their host countries. Such political reform could be simultaneously accompanied by policies designed to undermine the frequent Islamist role in social-welfare provision, which is a key basis of Islamist popular support.


Posted in  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Related Articles
Political Islam and Democracy - What do Islamists and Islamic Movements want?
Masri: Hamas’s keenness on dialogue is not weakness
Habib on MB Party Program, Dialogue with West
Habib on MB Party Program, Dialogue with West
Abu Zuhri: We Welcome Call for Dialogue with West
Dialogue With The Islamists
On the U.S./Islamists Dialogue, The Americans must thoroughly know who they’re talking to…
Adams urges world community to open dialogue with Hamas
Main Challenges Facing Islamic Movements In Recent History
Europe Is Growing Skeptical Of Dialogue With Muslims
Essam El-Erian: Dialogue Is A Foundation of Our Movement
MB Is Not Opposed To Dialogue With US Despite Reservations
Facts Over Washington’s Conference on Arab Islamic Movements
Should the West dialogue with Islamists?
Controversy Among Reformists in the Arab World Over Dialogue With Islamist Groups
Hamas Political Quake, its Effect on Mideast Islamic Movements
Katatny: Dialogue Between Islamists And The West a Necessity
Dialogue manifisto Between Islamists And The West