Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Tue109 2018

Last update19:14 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Issues > Political Islam Studies
Islamists in Politics: The Dynamics of Participation
Islamists in Politics: The Dynamics of Participation
Islamist movements participating in politics in the Middle East have reached an important crossroad. Despite some electoral success, they have failed to influence policy and are criticized by their base for abandoning their religious commitments. Islamist movements must convince their supporters that political participation is the best way to affect government in the long term, despite seemingly poor short term gains.
Saturday, December 13,2008 03:42
by Marina Ottaway, Amr Hamzawy Carnegie Endowment
Islamist movements participating in politics in the Middle East have reached an important crossroad. Despite some electoral success, they have failed to influence policy and are criticized by their base for abandoning their religious commitments. Islamist movements must convince their supporters that political participation is the best way to affect government in the long term, despite seemingly poor short term gains.

Marina Ottaway and Amr Hamzawy examine the experiences of “participating Islamist movements” in Morocco, Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Yemen. Islamists are torn between their need to compromise on some social and political issues to be effective political players and the risk of alienating their core supporters.

Key Conclusions:

  • Islamist movements are reacting to their failure to influence policy and criticism from their base by either reverting to hard-line stances or engaging in extensive debates that create uncertainty and weaken support.
  • Islamist movements operating without constant threat of repression by the state are more willing to compromise, focus on pragmatic policy issues, and remain committed to democratic processes, while Islamists whose participation is hampered by the state are more focused on ideological issues and marginalize reformers within the movement.  
  • The presence of Islamist movements with an armed wing affects the balance of power within a state and sometimes hinders the process of moderation, but excluding armed Islamists from the political process is unrealistic given their tremendous popular support.

The authors conclude:

“While participation is not invariably a process of further democratization and moderation, it is also clear that non-participation—either enforced by governments or chosen by the leadership of Islamist parties and movements—is a guarantee that a process of moderation will not take place. This is a sobering thought for those governments and their international backers that would like to set the bar for participation by Islamists extremely high. The choice is not between allowing the somewhat risky participation by Islamists in politics and their disappearance from the political scene. It is between allowing their participation despite the existence of gray zones with the possibility that a moderating process will unfold, and excluding them from the legal political process—thus ensuring the growing influence of hard-liners inside those movements and the continued existence of gray zones."

 

Full Text (English)

 www.muslimbrotherhood.com
ةعسمهةلاقخفاثقاخخي
هناصشىصثلا


Posted in Political Islam Studies  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Related Articles
Democracy ‘normalizes’ Islamists?
Islamists at the Gate, But It’s Okay
Why Does Islamists’ Dialog With The West Stumble?
What Moderate Islamists Expect from Obama?
Islamists’ Rise Could Benefit Women’s Rights
Contemporary Islamists in the Middle East
’Islamists edge towards democracy’
Reuters: Egypt’s Islamists Sees Election Setback in 2010
Mauritania Islamists: Military Coup Threatens the Country’s Stability
Islamists gain from Mideast turmoil and democratic deficit
Arab Islamists, their internal democracy
Reform between Islamists, Secularists
The West and the Islamists
US/INTERNATIONAL: Dialogue with Islamists
Islamists win seats in Kuwait Parliamentary poll
Why Islamists Don’t Win Elections
Political Islam and Democracy - What do Islamists and Islamic Movements want?
EGYPT: Islamists Given Jail, and a Message
Ikhwanweb Featured in BBC Report: Egypt Islamists Wait for Power
Morocco Islamists Harassed by Security Services
Campaigning for all (including Islamists)
Egypt Islamists in Hiding Ahead of Vote
Egypt Islamists fight obstacles to enter council vote
What it means... Yemeni Islamists’ stance on democracy
Political Islam and Democracy - What do Islamists and Islamic Movements want?
Let’s not forget the moderate Islamists
Analysis: Not all Islamists are equal
Workshop on Islamists Future in Arab Parliaments
Islamists emerge in stifled Tunisia
Egyptian court drops terrorism charges against Islamists
Elections in Jordan: Poor Showing for Islamists
Moderate Islamists and peaceful democracy
In Focus: The Autumn of Arab Islamists
Why are Western officials hesitant to talk to moderate Islamists ?
Jordan’s Islamists Seek Offices Their Allies Scorn
What today’s Islamists Want
Looking for Moderate Islamists
Turkish Paradox: Progressive Islamists versus Reactionary Secularists