Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Tue109 2018

Last update19:14 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Issues > Activites
Can Obama talk to the Brotherhood?
Can Obama talk to the Brotherhood?
Aiming to open dialogue with rivals of the US like Iran, Syria, and Russia and the Afghani Taliban movement, American president Barack Obama treads the steps of dialogue diplomacy. But can Obama follow the same diplomacy with the banned Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt?
Wednesday, March 25,2009 03:02
by Khalil Al-Anani* DailyStarEgypt.com

Aiming to open dialogue with rivals of the US like Iran, Syria, and Russia and the Afghani Taliban movement, American president Barack Obama treads the steps of dialogue diplomacy. But can Obama follow the same diplomacy with the banned Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt?

Unfortunately, the answer is no.

There are four reasons that will prevent the Obama administration from holding any dialogue with the Brotherhood.

First, Obama’s consultants see the political discourse of the Muslim Brotherhood as conflicting with democratic values concerning equality and discrimination between citizens on the grounds of religion and gender.

Second on the list is the Brotherhood’s antagonistic attitude towards Israel.

Obama’s administration believes that the Brotherhood’s extreme stance towards Israel is manifest in two points: not recognizing Israel as a state and supporting the Hamas movement, Israel’s archenemy.

The third reason is the wrong American perception regarding the possibility of a return to violence by the Brotherhood, or backing it up.

Finally, is the US perception that the Brotherhood is an unofficial group, legally speaking, and so there can be no talks with it.

On closer inspection, these are only pretexts, not real reasons. The Americans use them to hide the actual reasons. Regarding the first point, it is true that the political and religious discourse of the Muslim Brotherhood seems regressive, particularly concerning the rights of Copts and women, but this is more a consequence of the closed political climate in Egypt which provides the Brotherhood no chance to develop their ideas easily.

Moreover, this does not apply to the Brotherhood as a whole, as there is a reformation current within the young generation which adopts a more liberal attitude and defends the rights of Copts and women to be president. At the same time, Obama’s administration will hold talks with Taliban which forbids women from leaving their homes.

Concerning the second reason, the Brotherhood’s attitude towards Israel is no less hostile than the attitude of the nationalists, the Nasserists and ordinary Arabs. The key is not in changing the Brotherhood’s discourse but in the transformation of Israel’s brutal policies towards Palestinians, and respecting international decisions which give Palestinians their rights.

Note that the Brotherhood’s discourse is tactically tailored to recruit more people who are willing to change the instant Israel offers tangible compromise to the Palestinians.

It is relevant here to talk about what the Jordanian Brotherhood did in 1994 when they did not oppose the peace agreement Jordan signed with Israel known as “Wady Araba.” At the time strong oppositions stemmed from the Nasserists and nationalists not the Brotherhood. This was simply because there was a good relationship between the Brotherhood and Jordanian regime, which proves that the Muslim Brotherhood is characterized by pragmatism and political realism.

The third reason is altogether wrong, associated as it is, with Western stereotypes of the Muslim Brotherhood in general. They refer to what the group was like in the 40s and 50s, not in 2009. Now the Brotherhood has criminalized violence and seeks inclusion in political life.

As for the fourth reason, it is fictional. The Brotherhood are banned legally but they exist politically and socially and they shape the only major opposition force in Egypt.

I believe that the real motive for the non-existence of American dialogue with the Brotherhood is the American administration’s fear of upsetting the Egyptian regime, and the desire to maintain the historical alliance between the two sides on one hand, and the fear of upsetting Israel and maintaining its interests on the other.

The question is, does the Brotherhood want to talk to Obama? This I will discuss in my next column.

* Khalil Al-Anani is an Egyptian expert on political Islam and democratization in the Middle East and is a senior fellow at Al-Ahram Foundation. E-mail: [email protected].

The Source


Posted in Activites , MB Understanding , Islamic Movements , Human Rights , Obama  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Related Articles
To Engage or Disengage...That is the Question?
Will Obama go beyond the superficial?
Mishaal: Obama using new language towards Middle East
Nunu: Haneyya asked Obama to turn his words into deeds
Obama’s Middle East moment of truth
Obama takes a cue from Clinton era
Scholars Urge Obama to Push for Democracy in Middle East
Anxiety And Engagement
Obama starts well with Muslims but must do more
Obama’s No Socialist. I Should Know.
Mr. Obama: Don’t let Israel destroy America
Obama backs off on Israel, again
Open Letter to President Obama about Democracy Promotion in the Middle East and the Muslim World
Memo to Obama: don’t abandon Arab democrats
Expert: Obama’s Administration Prioritises settlement of Arab-Israeli Conflict
Bi-Partisan Group of Prominent Scholars and Experts Urge President Obama to Make Democracy
Iraqi MB: Obama’s Decision to Withdraw a Step in the Right Direction
Take Action on President Obama’s FY2010 Budget Request for Military Aid to Israel
Obama: faith should unite, not divide
Pointers for the Obama Administration in the Middle East: Avoiding Myths and Vain Hopes
Al Baradie’s Call to the Government to Engage MB
Welcome to Obama’s “New Era of Peace”
Why the Muslim World Can’t Hear Obama ?
Report: Obama will deal with the Palestinian cause in the interest of Israel
Thoughts on Obama’s Outreach to the Arab World
Obama allows CIA kidnappings worldwide as first job
Questions for Barack Obama
Obama moves swiftly on Middle East
Obama’s Middle East challenge
Reactions to Obama’s Al Arabiya Interview
Why Did Obama Choose Al-Arabiya for His First Major Interview?
Haniyyah Calls On Obama to Back Palestinians’ Right to Liberty and Independence
Transcript of Obama’s Interview On Al-Arabiya Television
Obama: Regime Rotation
Resilient Arab regimes deaf to Obama’s words
Question for Barack Obama on Middle East Envoys: How come there ain’t no brothers on the wall?
In Case You Missed It, Obama’s Speech at AIPAC
POMED Asks: “As President, What Should Obama Say to the Middle East?”
Editorial: Not In Defense of Obama
Obama’s Palestine choices
Obama, Middle East and the Freedom Agenda
Obama’s win promotes democracy in Arab world
On Obama’s Inherited Freedom Agenda
The Muslim Brotherhood is Pro-Dialogue, Engagement of Women and Copts : Habib
Islamist Pragmatists Ripe for Engagement?
U.S. engages Muslim Brotherhood despite Rice
Engaged to Hamas
To Engage or Not to Engage?
We Must Engage With Moderate Muslims
Political Islam: Ready for Engagement?
Engagement or Quarantine: How to Deal with the Islamist Advance
View from Dubai: Why the West must engage Islamists