Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Tue109 2018

Last update19:14 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Issues > Activites
Talking with Hamas and the Taliban
Talking with Hamas and the Taliban
In the New York Times, Roger Cohen discusses a recent interview with Recep Tayyip Erdogan where the Turkish PM called for a new balance in U.S. policy toward the Middle East and argued “Hamas must be represented at the negotiating table. Only then can you get a solution.” Cohen explains, “how Hamas is viewed is a pivotal issue in the current American Middle East policy review. The victor in 2006 Palestinian elections, Hamas is seen throughout the region as a legitimate resistance movem
Monday, April 6,2009 11:05
pomed.org

In the New York Times, Roger Cohen discusses a recent interview with Recep Tayyip Erdogan where the Turkish PM called for a new balance in U.S. policy toward the Middle East and argued “Hamas must be represented at the negotiating table. Only then can you get a solution.” Cohen explains, “how Hamas is viewed is a pivotal issue in the current American Middle East policy review. The victor in 2006 Palestinian elections, Hamas is seen throughout the region as a legitimate resistance movement.” Furthermore, attempts to marginalize it have proven ineffective as it is entrenched in the Palestinian political and social movement.

Shlomo Avineri at Haaretz agrees with those who call for dialogue with Hamas; albeit for a different reason. He explains, “it is clear we need to talk with them” but a focus should be placed on “what is written in their founding covenant.” Outlining some of the main points of Hamas’ charter, Avineri writes, “if a movement like this were to come out of Europe, no one would even imagine that negotiations be held with it, or that it be asked to join a government…An abomination like that has no place in any political discourse.” Nevertheless, if people want diplomatic engagement with the organization, Avineri thinks this issue is what really should be addressed.

Meanwhile, at The Huffington Post, Robert Naiman advocates talking with the Taliban as it “costs nothing, kills no-one, and is compatible and complementary, at least initially, with every other strategy.” He further notes, “why not make agreements with most of the people we are now fighting, and agree to a timetable for withdrawal, as we have done in Iraq?”

The Source


Posted in Activites , Human Rights , Islamic Movements  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Related Articles
POMED Notes: Engagement and the Syrian Opposition
To Engage or Disengage...That is the Question?
Anxiety And Engagement
Al Baradie’s Call to the Government to Engage MB
The Muslim Brotherhood is Pro-Dialogue, Engagement of Women and Copts : Habib
Islamist Pragmatists Ripe for Engagement?
U.S. engages Muslim Brotherhood despite Rice
Engaged to Hamas
To Engage or Not to Engage?
We Must Engage With Moderate Muslims
Political Islam: Ready for Engagement?
Engagement or Quarantine: How to Deal with the Islamist Advance
View from Dubai: Why the West must engage Islamists