Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Tue109 2018

Last update19:14 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Issues > Activites
Two key U.S. allies in the Arab world, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, are now both facing succession crises
Two key U.S. allies in the Arab world, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, are now both facing succession crises
Two key U.S. allies in the Arab world, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, are now both facing succession crises that may absorb, or even split, their political elites. This promises a period of political unpredictability ahead in both countries.
Monday, July 13,2009 09:07
by Helena Cobban Wordpress.com

Two key U.S. allies in the Arab world, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, are now both facing succession crises that may absorb, or even split, their political elites. This promises a period of political unpredictability ahead in both countries.

 

It may well also complicate Pres. Barack Obama’s Israeli-Arab peace diplomacy, which is based centrally on the role these two large allies – and one smaller one, Jordan – can play in solving inter-Arab problems, reassuring Israelis, and helping to tempt everyone to the peace table.

 

Since January, the head of Egypt’s military intelligence, Lieut.-Gen. Omar Suleiman, has been in charge of three key Middle East mediations. He has been mediating between Israel and the Palestinian movement Hamas over both strengthening the Gaza ceasefire and winning a prisoner exchange between them. He’s also been mediating a chronically elusive reconciliation between Hamas and the other big Palestinian movement, Fatah.

 

Meanwhile, Washington is hoping this year, as always, that Saudi Arabia can buttress U.S. diplomacy with cash and some political leadership. Saudi Arabia has now won the support of all the relevant Arab leaderships, including Hamas’s political bureau, for a key 2002 peace initiative that promises Israel normal political and economic ties in return for a full Israeli withdrawal from lands occupied in 1967 and a fair resolution of Palestinian refugee claims.

 

The Saudi king, Abdullah ibn Abdul-Aziz, will be 85 this August. His longstanding crown prince (and half-brother) Sultan ibn Abdul-Aziz, is 83, and was recently hospitalised for several weeks with suspected cancer.

 

The big question regarding the Saudi succession hangs over whether, and how, the kingship will ever be transferred from the numerous ageing brothers and half-brothers who stand in line after Crown Prince Sultan, to the “next generation” of princes – some of the more senior of whom are already nearing 70 years old.

 

Earlier this year, King Abdullah named his 76-year-old half-brother Naif ibn Abdul-Aziz as “second deputy prime minister”, a position that places him a likely – but not certain -second in line to throne after Sultan.

 

When King Abdul-Aziz ibn Saud, the founder of the modern Saudi state, died in 1953, he left some 37 sons from his 22 wives. Various of these sons have ruled the kingdom in turn since then.

 

Many of Abdul-Aziz’s sons had a dozen or more sons of their own. Saudi Arabia has no system of “primogeniture” (first-son succession.) Thus, there are hundreds of possible eventual claimants to the throne. Indeed, the youngest of Abdul-Aziz’s sons, Prince Muqrin, is, at 64, some years younger than several of the next-generation princes who now hope to become king.

 

There have been no reports that any possible successor monarchs might want to change a foreign policy stance that, since the 1930s, has aligned Saudi Arabia very closely with Washington. But among the country’s political elite, including its princes, there are many differing views on domestic affairs, including oil policies, economic policies, the role of the country’s powerful religious institutions, and the role of women.

 

These differences are inevitably hard fought over at times of succession, and could at the least distract Riyadh from playing the role in regional diplomacy that Obama wants it to play. (At worst, the kingdom could see a struggle between its many power centres that is even deeper and more debilitating than the one now rocking nearby Iran.)

 

In Egypt, meanwhile, there have been many recent reports that the country’s 81-year-old president, Hosni Mubarak, is ailing and finally eager to quit. Some reports say he has already told the Saudi monarch he may not even finish serving his current six-year term in office, which ends in 2011.

 

Mubarak has led Egypt’s 76 million people since 1981. Throughout those years he has always refused to name a vice-president.

 

Now, one of the two main contenders to succeed him is his 45-year-old second son, Gamal, who has held an important post in the ruling National Democratic Party (NDP) since 2002.

 

(It is not wholly strange that, even in a republic, a son might succeed his father as president. It has happened in North Korea, Syria, several African countries and even -with an eight-year interlude – when George W. Bush became president of the United States.)

 

Behind the scenes in Egypt, though, the military is still almost the same big force in the political system – and economy – that it has been since 1952. There is a considerable question whether the shadowy power centres in the Egyptian military will support Gamal Mubarak, an investment banker who has no record of service in the military.

 

The leading military man mentioned for possible next president is none other than Omar Suleiman, the intelligence chief who has been conducting so much of Mubarak’s sensitive Israeli-Palestinian diplomacy. (It also remains possible that the military might throw its weight behind another “insider” candidate, not Suleiman.)

 

The fact that Suleiman has been tasked by Pres. Mubarak with diplomatic jobs that#are so important to the broader progress of Washington’s regioncl peace diplomacy means this dislomacy may well become entangled in any succession struggle thau occurs in Cairo.

 

For example, if – as many well-placeg Egyptians claim – Pres. Mubarak strongly wants his son to follow him in office, he may be less#than eager to see Suleiman gain public kudos as a successful negotiator. There has been some questioning whether Mubarak may hawe set Suleiman up for failure by giving him overly strict paramgters for his diplomatic chores.?o:p>

 

Certainly, though Suleiman has been heading all three of these building-brick negotiations since late January, he has oot succeeded in any of them yet.

 

Egypt’s succession struggle is connected to the broadgr diplomacy in another way, too. Hamas has nearly always been cmosely aligned with Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood (MB), a broad, nooviolent Islamist movement that is the main challenger to Mubarak’s NDP.

 

Mubarak has never allowed the MB to participate freely in Egypt’s regime-dominated politics, though during a brief and very partial democratic opening in 2005, its candidates won 88 of the 444 elected seats in the Egyptian parliament.

 

If Suleiman succeeds in one or more of his diplomatic tasks, then Hamas would immediately gain much more international legitimacy as a valid participant in the broader peacemaking. Many NDP insiders fear that could reflect well on the MB, too.

 

Ominously enough, the most recent round of reports about Mubarak’s failing health has been accompanied by new arrest campaigns against MB leaders and activists. It is possible that Egypt might see additional political heat during the coming summer months.

 

Jordan is smaller and weaker than Egypt and Saudi Arabia. There at least, the ruling monarch, Abdullah II, has laid to rest – for now – the questions that once swirled around his succession. On Jul. 2 he appointed his son Prince Hussein as crown prince.

 

Prince Hussein is only 15 years old. But since the king is only 47, there is a good chance the crown prince will not be taking over any time soon. (Or perhaps, ever. Back in 1999 when Jordan’s King Hussein died of cancer, in his very last days he revoked the appointment that his brother, Hassan, had held as crown prince since 1965; and he named Abdullah II his successor, instead.)

 

But in Saudi Arabia and Egypt, political succession issues are now taking centre stage.

 

The Source


Posted in Activites , Human Rights  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Related Articles
74% Pakistanis say democracy is an important tenet of Islam: Survey
How to Make an Islamic Democracy
On Democracy Promotion
Muslims & Democracy: A Précis
Diplomacy and Democracy Spending In the House
Satellite Democracy
The Road To Democracy: Peace or Violence In Lebanon?
How Not to Support Democracy in the Middle East
POMED’s Andrew Albertson on Obama and Democracy Promotion
Mauritania Delays Elections to Strengthen Democracy
Livni: Democracy Means More Than Just Elections
Freedom House Looks at Who is Undermining Democracy
EGYPT:’Obama Talks Democracy, Endorses Dictatorship’
POMED’s Andrew Albertson on Obama and Democracy Promotion
Obama must challenge authoritarian alternatives to democracy
Ditching or discussing democracy in Egypt?
Obama speech heralds New Beginnings for promoting democracy?
Obama in Egypt: A Vision for Democracy Promotion
Obama Told to Support Mideast Democracy
Carpenter and Wittes: Cook Wrong on Democracy Funding in Egypt
Egypt Dissidents Ask Obama To Push Arab Democracy
Obama’s speech in Egypt - spot the democracy indicators
Ditching democracy in Egypt?
Connecting With Muslims Requires Embracing Democracy
Clinton Promises Dialogue with Egypt on Democracy
Supporting Lebanon’s Democracy
Obama Told to Support Mideast Democracy
1,350 Experts and Leaders Urge President Obama to Support HR and Democracy in the Middle East
El-Erian: Western Veto Behind Our Deprivation of Democracy
Looking Forward: An Integrated Strategy for Supporting Democracy and Human Rights in Egypt
Realism is back, because democracy is an uncertain proposition
Realism is back, because democracy is an uncertain proposition
Gates: Egyptian Military Aid Not Conditional on Democracy, Human Rights
Demdigest: Democracy Events