Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Tue109 2018

Last update19:14 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Opinions > Other Opinions
How to Revive Obama's Middle East Policy? Some Responses.
How to Revive Obama's Middle East Policy? Some Responses.
In the article, I criticized the Obama administration for cutting assistance to Egyptian NGOs. As I argue toward the end of the piece, civil society assistance has too often been used as a sort of default policy stand-in, in the absence of bolder, more effective strategies. Increasing civil society assistance in the Arab world might very well be the most regurgitated, unimaginative policy proposal at our disposal. TBE argue that “democratization aid tends to go toward things like workshops to teach people about democracy and paying native English speakers to write the reports about how money is being spent that funders demand.” Too often, this is true. But I’m more concerned with what the reduction of assistance says about our priorities in Egypt. Budgets, after all, speak louder than words.
Tuesday, January 5,2010 23:31
Democracy Arsenal

Last month, an article of mine on Obama’s (faltering) Middle East strategy came out in Democracy: A Journal Ideas, which prompted some insightful responses in the blogosphere. Jim Arkedis of progressivefix and friend of DA seemed to like it. The Cairo-based Boursa Exchange (TBE), on the other hand, wrote a longish critique. A couple of their points are worth flagging.

In the article, I criticized the Obama administration for cutting assistance to Egyptian NGOs. As I argue toward the end of the piece, civil society assistance has too often been used as a sort of default policy stand-in, in the absence of bolder, more effective strategies. Increasing civil society assistance in the Arab world might very well be the most regurgitated, unimaginative policy proposal at our disposal. TBE argue that “democratization aid tends to go toward things like workshops to teach people about democracy and paying native English speakers to write the reports about how money is being spent that funders demand.” Too often, this is true. But I’m more concerned with what the reduction of assistance says about our priorities in Egypt. Budgets, after all, speak louder than words.

And there are ways to make U.S. civil society assistance more effective. Depending on how you define terms, the Muslim Brotherhood is arguably the largest civil society organization in the Arab world, with a vast, interlocking network of hospitals, clinics, mosques, schools, foundations, boy scout troops, and day care centers in numerous countries. Those that argue that the Muslim Brotherhood is an anti-democratic organization - and therefore uncivil - are a bit off the mark. For instance, he Islamic Action Front, the political wing of the Jordanian Brotherhood, might very well be the most democratically run political party in the Arab world. Even the Egyptian Brotherhood, which is less democratic, is still more internally democratic than most of its secular counterparts.

As I note, however, the State Department’s Middle East Partnership Initiative (MEPI) has an informal ban on funding Brotherhood-affiliated organizations in Egypt and has not allowed Brotherhood leaders to participate in conferences that receive MEPI funding. This led to me to suggest the following: “As a simple first step to remove such hurdles, Secretary Clinton should issue a directive explicitly permitting all State Department employees to meet with and incorporate members of Brotherhood in their programming.”

TBE write “but we also think it quite simplistic when writers claim that regimes in the region use the Palestinian issue to focus citizens’ anger away from the regimes’ own misdeeds. It has been our experience that people (not just in the Middle East, but everywhere, if you can imagine) are perfectly capable of denouncing injustice abroad without forgetting about injustice at home.” I don't believe I made any such claim, although it is, in general terms, an accurate one. There’s only so much one person can be angry about, particularly when it’s much more practical for the average Egyptian to become angry about Israel than to become angry about domestic politics. The former is permitted, sometimes even encouraged, while the latter can land you in jail. I think I know which one I’d choose. 

TBE then go on to critique the two policy “pillars” that I recommend for U.S. policymakers – “positive conditionality” and Islamist engagement: “We don’t find the idea of positive conditionality likely to be implemented.” Neither do I. That’s why I wrote the article.

Later: “Hamid presupposes that the Brotherhood wants to talk to the US.” This is not a presupposition or even a supposition. A number of Brotherhood leaders and officials have explicitly told me that they want to talk to the U.S. Of course, the conditions have to be right. But the desire is there. To some extent, it’s already happened in isolated instances, informally and off-the-record, sometimes through interlocutors and other times directly. More generally, the Egyptian Brotherhood, in recent years, has devoted increased attention and resources to reaching out to Western audiencesand in particular the policy community. In 2005, the Brotherhood’s Guidance Bureau, the organization’s top decision-making body, launched an internal initiative under the title “Re-introducing the Brotherhood to the West.”

In a section called “our solutions,” TBE say “the most important thing US-based democracy-in-Egypt-supporters could be doing right now is voicing full-throated support for a settlement in Palestine.” Well, this is precisely what I argue against in my article. Democracy has been held hostage to the peace process long enough. How much longer should we wait? What if a peace settlement is finally signed 30 years now? Are Egyptians supposed to wait 20 years for their freedom, and why should Egyptians wait for Palestinians to form their own state, before they can control their own?

Fortunately, the U.S., can walk and chew gum at the same time (although, in practice, this hasn’t always been evident), by supporting the peace process while simultaneously having a more assertive pro-democracy posture toward its autocratic allies, who, in any case, haven’t made for great allies.

tags: Engage / Moderate / Shadi Hamid / Engage Hamas / Engage MB / Engage / Muslim Brotherhood / Moderate Muslim Brotherhood / Obama / Democracy Promotion
Posted in Other Opinions , Islamic Movements , MB and West , MB in International press  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Related Articles
Expert Weighs In On New Security Steps For U.S.-Bound Flights
Shadi Hamid: Jordan is, in short, an absolute monarchy
US should engage Islamists to push democracy in Arab world, says expert
The Struggle over Democracy in the Middle East
Obama Told to Support Mideast Democracy
‘Obama Doctrine’ to be unveiled in Cairo?
How Can the U.S. President Speak to Two Audiences at Once?
Obama Told to Support Mideast Democracy
1,350 Experts and Leaders Urge President Obama to Support HR and Democracy in the Middle East
Akbar Ahmed and Andrew Natsios sign Open Letter to President Obama
Islamist Govts Not the Enemy, Say Mideast Experts
Ikhwanweb News Digest 13-04-09
Democracy’s time: a reply to Tarek Osman
To Engage or Disengage...That is the Question?
Democracy Promotion in the Aftermath of Iraq
Democracy Support in the Middle East
Middle East democratic reforms call
U.S.: Islamist Govts Not the Enemy, Say Mideast Experts
To take political Islam seriously, the West can’t romanticise it
Open Letter to President Obama about Democracy Promotion in the Middle East and the Muslim World
Memo to Obama: don’t abandon Arab democrats
Bi-Partisan Group of Prominent Scholars and Experts Urge President Obama to Make Democracy
POMED Notes: Strategies for Engaging Political Islam: A Middle East, U.S., and E.U. Trialogue
Strategies for Engaging Political Islam: A Middle East, U.S. and EU ’Trialogue’
Events
Is political islam a threat to the west?
Reactions to Obama’s Al Arabiya Interview
In search of a lasting legacy
Is political Islam a threat to the west?
Political Islam not a threat to the West
The Islamist Dilemma
Resolving America’s Islamist Dilemma:Lessons from South and Southeast Asia
Ideology vs. pragmatism: Is one more important than the other?
Turkey Joins the Fray
Window of Opportunity
The “new” realism…?
Necessary Risks
Fair Winds for the Brotherhood
The Muslim Brotherhood and the Egyptian Regime
Speech Translation
A River in Egypt
Looking for Moderate Islamists
Understanding the Retributive Impulse
Rejoin the Battle of Ideas
POMED-SAIS Event on Islamist Political Participation in Turkey and Morocco
The POMED Wire, Upcoming Events
Tough year for Muslims
EVENT: Islamist Political Participation and Democratic Development
CSID EMAIL BULLETIN
Most Muslims Against Iraq War, But Say U.S. Aid Needed
CSID: Eighth Annual Conference
Marc Lynch:Let the Great Muslim Brotherhood Debate continue!
Supporting Dissidents in Egypt: Muslim Brotherhood, Ayman Nour
Islam, Reform and Liberalism Intersect
Elections in Egypt: Time to Back Up Our Rhetoric with Action
Democracy also means that Islamists are allowed to vote
Time to take a stand on Egypt’s democracy
The Challenge of Democracy In the Muslim World
Torture and Silence: This Year’s Arab Spring?
The Path to War With Iran
CSID EMAIL BULLETIN - AUGUST 24, 2006
Vision Gap
CSID EMAIL BULLETIN - Sep. 19, 2006
What Comes First - Elections or Institutions?
CSID EMAIL BULLETIN -Oct. 11, 2006
Open Forum on The Muslim Brotherhood
Engaging Moderate Muslims—Really?
Ikhwanweb Covers The NYU Forum On The Muslim Brotherhood
Nick Fielding’s Speech At The NYU Forum On The MB
What You Need To Know About Alyssa A. Lappen
State of Denial
Terror Watch: Row Over Barred Muslim Scholars
US Islamic Center: Democrats More Tolerant Towards Muslims
Muslim Brotherhood to Form New Political Party
Analysis: Egypt’s cat and mouse game
Neocon to Neocons; Learn from our mistakes and move forward
Iran: The War Begins
Democracy or Stability?
The Muslim Brotherhood and the Egyptian Regime:Towards Confrontation?
Democratic backsliding in Middle East addressed at NED/CSID event
Strategic Thinking about the Muslim Brotherhood
Islamists between Regime and Electorate’
Hear out Muslim Brotherhood
Is the Muslim Brotherhood Moderate or Radical?
Amr Al-Chobaki Writes: From Washington
Essam El-Erian: Dialogue Is A Foundation of Our Movement
Response to Patrick Poole’s
Parting the Veil
Bush Weighs Reaching Out To ‘Brothers’
Georgetown Symposium on Islamist Politics
US Considering Engaging Muslim Brothers?
around the web
Should America Fear Middle East Democracy?
Parting the Veil II
Mixed Baghdad
Mixed Baghdad Bloggers on the White House’s Iraq progress report.
Engaging Political Islam to Promote Democracy
Aiding and Abetting Egyptian Repression
Nuance is for Sissies