Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Tue927 2022

Last update02:07 AM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Issues > Islamic Movements
Is al-Qaeda winning?
Is al-Qaeda winning?
What does it say about Washington's ''war on terror'' that dozen and a half people with paper cutters forced hundreds of thousands of Western troops into the battlefields of the "greater Middle East" region;
Tuesday, January 19,2010 14:43

What does it say about Washington's ''war on terror'' that dozen and a half people with paper cutters forced hundreds of thousands of Western troops into the battlefields of the "greater Middle East" region;
That 100,000 foreign soldiers are bogged down in occupied Afghanistan wondering how many dozens of al-Qaeda operatives have remained, if any;
That the most liberal democracy enacted new controversial illiberal laws and unpatriotic practices under its "Patriot Act";
That one shoe-bomber has forced millions of people to take off their shoes every time they take a flight;
That one underpants-bomber will expose every other traveler in most humiliating of ways;
That after US loss of deterrence and prestige as well as trillions of dollars of military and other expenditures, al-Qaeda's top leadership remains at large; its bases/cells proliferate globally; that volunteers continue to flock into its ranks and young supporters to its websites… !!! And above all that it continues to terrorize America and Americans.
So much that one gets the impression that America is fighting a world superpower despite the incredible disparities in capacity, numbers and support.
Is al-Qaeda winning? Has the United States lost?

Hitting the Jackpot
A dozen years ago, a demoralized group with nowhere to go but the hills of Afghanistan, al-Qaeda began targeting America instead of the region's authoritarian regimes hoping to destabilize the region, bloody America's nose and gain popularity.
Its strategy was simple: Draw the US into direct confrontation against and within the Muslim world. Like sheep to the slaughter house, America walked right into its trap.
Al-Qaeda was lucky. With a 'cowboy' and so-called "chicken-hawks" (militarists who ever served in the military) dominating the White House and the Pentagon… military escalation was only a question of time and intensity.
The Bush administration decided to "take the war to the enemy so as not to fight it at home". This is exactly what al-Qaeda hoped for considering it wasn't applying for Green cards for its members.
It all went as smooth as a scripted movie. After the 9/11 attacks at the pillars of its world status, the Pentagon and Wall Street, the wounded superpower went on a rampage. Like a bull in a china shop, it responded with little or no thinking of the consequences of its military actions.
Warmongers took advantage of the threat to US national security to advance their military agenda in foreign policy and the radical American Right exploited what they termed as the threat to "our way of life" to transform America's way of life towards the Right.
Washington called for a "crusade", then changed it into a "war" on terror and under its guise, went on to occupy Afghanistan and Iraq and support Israel's bloody wars in Lebanon andPalestine.  It also intervened in Somalia, Yemen and Pakistan and put direct pressure on its allies to confront their Islamist movements.
In no time, the US was preoccupied by its draining occupation and costly military operations. And as expected, the terrible human cost only added petrol to the flames of hatred.
Paradoxically, anti-Americanism has been more rampant under "friendly regimes" like in Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey etc. than others.
America's unfortunate and disproportionate use of military force to defeat a segmented, mobile and polycentric movement of several hundred core groups of fighters didn't make it any more secure or dissuasive.
As the Obama administration asks for $33 bn extra budget above the already approved $660 bn for 2010, I remember what Richard Meyers, the former head of the US joint chiefs of staff, told me several weeks ago how a decade later, the US still doesn’t have a strategy to deal with "the global insurgency" facing America.
Beyond military
Popular opposition and world denunciations of US military campaign has fallen on deaf ears in Washington. Instead of seriously reversing its military expansion, the Obama administration has accelerated it in the Afghan-Pakistan area and it seems adamant to repeat more of the same in Yemen.
Needless to say, no serious strategic analyst would advise abandoning military power all together. However, Washington's dependency on, even addiction to, firepower has neutralized or nullified all other efforts towards defusing support for al-Qaeda and truly winning hearts.
Good-will gestures provided by President Obama and his attempts to reconnect to the Arab and Islamic world on the basis of "mutual interest and mutual respect" can hardly be heard considering the echoes of drone fired missiles, speeding F-15 jets and rolling tanks.
The more Washington used its military force, the less it won the minds of those it needs most to defeat al-Qaeda: Americans, Arabs and Muslims.
Likewise, US military actions are harming its intelligence and law enforcement work that over the last decade have dealt the greatest blow to al-Qaeda's leadership and organisation.
Zero Sum strategy
As military adventures kill, maim and destroy lives, they create, nurture and build animosities and "alliances" among most unlikely allies, such as a young rich Nigerian that studies in London, a Jordanian doctor that studies in Turkey and an Arab-American soldier trained by the Pentagon, all whom were ready to die to hurt America.
And likewise, counter terror tactics and intelligence work has made it ever more difficult for public diplomacy to "win hearts and minds". Instead of listening to people of the region, it has been spying on them and instead of reading them their rights, it has tortured them in far-away prisons.
And instead of hearing out their concerns and fears, Washington has underlined its own above all others.
In that limited and limiting spirit, for example, mostly impoverished Yemenis that suffer from war in the north, intensive conflict in the south and three decade autocratic regime, must now worry about US fears, and cater to US interests above their own.
Which brings us back to our initial question: al- Qaeda is winning only as far as Washington is running a self-defeating war.
However, one needs to remember that in the self-defeating war on terror, winner and loser is one and the same.
As long as America puts its security preoccupations and political interests about those under its military and strategic domination, the Pentagon and al-Qaeda will  feed into one another and the Americans, Arabs and Muslims will continue to be the ultimate losers.

tags: Qaeda / Qaida / Engage / Moderate / Bin Laden / Qaeda / Badie / Terrorism / Jihad In Islam / Abdullah Azzam / Zawahiri / Religion Of Peace / War On Terror / Moderate MB / Moderate Islamists / Moderate Muslim Brotherhood
Posted in Islamic Movements , MB VS. Qaeda  
Jihad Mujahid
Salam Why is the MB against Al-Qaeda? If AQ was not there, the US had already taken Iraq and Afghanistan. IT is not because of the war on terrorism that the US attacked the Middle east, the US had plans to attack the Middle-east a long time. Al-Qaeda is defending and fighting for its belive and for the Islam. At least AQ is is doing something against the attacks of the kufar. Also Hamas is defending its rights. But MB is criticising the AQ organisation while the MB is just talking a lot, but not doing anything in form of Jihad for its muslimbrothers in the warzones. The West attacked us, so its time to defend. IF MB wants to do it all peacfull, than that is very good, but sometimes, especcialy when the kufar attack you, its is nececerry to take the weapons.
Tuesday, February 1,2011 20:07
MB Markus
What a lot of crap, America NEVER, at anytime wanted to attack ANYBODY in the Middle East, what were they supposed to do when, terrorists took over planes and attacked them! kiss their butts! if the USA wanted to, they could wipe out the WHOLE of the middle east, never forget that!
Wednesday, March 16,2011 13:49
jihad marcus tawheed
mb is not against jihad or alqaida but play the card of alqaida against the West. we as Muslims know that alqaida is a idiologie and that the Western definition is an illusion. watch marcus. hij stil believes in the words of bush. Al Qaida is a legintiem resistance against Western domination in the region. Most alqaida members come from mb. so let the Westerners to settle for a mb statement that criticized Western understanding of alqaida.
Tuesday, March 29,2011 00:53
Muslim Brotherhood doesn\\\'t like AQ because MuslimBrotherhoodSupportingAtheist
AQ is a terrorist group and the Muslim Brotherhood became pacifist in the 60's,
Friday, April 22,2011 01:42
Osama Bin laden Is DEAD mesa
Americans celebrate, flags are flying everywhere, the national anthem is being sung, soldiers are uniting to defeat more terrorists...Justice Has Been Done OBL was KILLED thanks be to Allah
Monday, May 2,2011 18:52
Related Articles
Is al-Qaeda winning?
The End of Al-Qaeda
Did Al-Qaeda ever matter as much as we think it did?
Al-Qaeda threat used once again to justify war
Al-Qaida kills eight times more Muslims than Non-Muslims
Workshop in Cairo discusses Al-qaeda's future.
There are Many Ways to Exploit Al-Qaeda’s Vulnerabilities
60 drone hits kill 14 al-Qaeda men, 687 civilians
Muslim Publics Oppose Al Qaeda’s Terrorism, But Agree With Its Goal of Driving U.S. Forces Out
PIPA: Muslims still don’t like al-Qaeda or the U.S.
The Mumbai Attacks - Al Qaeda, Pakistani Proxies or Hindutva Backlash?
Al-Qaeda supporters back John McCain for president
Hamas: Qaeda in Gaza, False Excuse To Continue Siege
Explaining 20 years of Al-Qaeda
Islamic Movements Expert Says Al-Qaeda Call For Killing Him Is as “very serious” and extremist.
Al-Qaeda to Reward Assassins of Iraqi Muslim Brotherhood
“Crystal Clear Difference between the MB’s Ideology and that of the Al-Qaeda Network
Al Qaeda fears mount
Al Qaeda to Iran
Al Qaradawi Urges Al-Qaeda Release Two Austrian Hostages
The Middle East, Al Qaeda or Peace?
Hamas and al-Qaida: The Prospects for Radicalization in the Palestinian Occupied Territories
Why America is losing to al-Qaida
Can Morocco’s Islamists check al-Qaida?
Al-Qaida’s No. 2 may fear losing sway with radicals
Internet as a Forum for Conflict Between MB and Al-Qaida