Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Tue109 2018

Last update19:14 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
Palestine
On Jewish loyalty
On Jewish loyalty
Gilad atzmon considers the meaning of “loyalty” in Jewish discourse, against the background of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s demand that the Palestinians recognize Israel as an exclusively Jewish state and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman’s insistence that all Israelis swear an oath of loyalty to the Jewish state.
Tuesday, September 21,2010 14:08
by Gilad Atzmon redress.cc

Recognizing Israel as an exclusively Jewish is one of the key demands made by Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu in the latest talks with the Palestinians. However, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman took it one step further. He demanded that all Israelis swear an oath of loyalty to the Jewish state. Lieberman’s campaign slogan is "no loyalty, no citizenship".

"We can't continue to ignore issues like that of Haneen Zoabi, who identifies completely with the other side,"
said Lieberman on 19 September. He was referring to an Israeli Arab member of the Knesset who was stripped of her parliamentary privileges after sailing aboard the heroic Mavi Marmara, and being witness to the Israeli massacre in the high seas.

“So here we are: Israel is basically a Western liberal ‘multicultural’ society where all different ethnicities and minorities are required to swear loyalty to the ultimate form of chauvinist Jewish tribal practice.”

 

So here we are: Israel is basically a Western liberal “multicultural” society where all different ethnicities and minorities are required to swear loyalty to the ultimate form of chauvinist Jewish tribal practice.

 

Issues to do with loyalty are of the essence within Jewish political discourse. It was the doubt regarding Dreyfus’s loyalty that transformed Herzl into a Zionist. It was loyalty to the Jews that made Jonathan Pollard betray the USA. It was Mordechai Vanunu’s ethical and universal commitment that pushed him away from Jewish loyalty. As we know, he is still paying a heavy price for that commitment. As it seems, “loyalty to the Jews” is a crucial demand within the Zionist discourse.

But here we face a clear difficulty. Though clearly political Jews demand loyalty, it is far from clear what this loyalty is. Neither Lieberman nor anyone else has ever suggested what “loyalty to the Jewish state” stands for. Clearly, no one, not even the Jewish left, has ever managed to point to a Jewish universal, moral or ethical value system for there is no such system.

I guess that Jewish loyalty is an empty signifier: it is a dynamic notion; it changes constantly; it is impossible to pinpoint. As it happens, Jewish loyalty is removed from any notion of universalism, ethics or integrity. All it means in practice is, “Jews come first”.

In a recent
video Max Blumenthal managed to collate a few morbid Jewish youngsters who are keen to swear loyalty to the Jewish state, its Jewish army and its commanders. Clearly, the Goldstone report didn’t make enough waves in Israel or within young Zionist circles around the world. One American Jewess said she would be happy to send Palestinians away from “her” land if they fail to swear an oath to Jewish primacy. Another Jewess admitted that when it comes to loyalty, Israel comes first while her motherland, Canada, comes second. This obviously raises a question. Who are political Jews loyal to?

Since loyalty is crucial within the Zionist discourse we may want to extend our study and challenge those who identify and operate politically as Jews to tell us about their loyalty. I would love, for instance, to know about Lord Levy, the number one fundraiser for the Labour Party at the time this party dragged us into a criminal war: who is he loyal to, Israel or Britain? And what about
Jewish Chronicle writers David Aaronovitch and Nick Cohen: are they primarily loyal to the United Kingdom or to the Jewish state? I wonder because they both rallied for the Iraq war in the British national press. And what about David Miliband, the leading candidate for the Labour premiership, who is also listed on an Israeli propaganda site as an Israeli propaganda writer, who is he loyal to? I guess that every member of Labour’s, the Conservatives’ and the Liberal Democrats’ Friend of Israel lobbies had better be challenged on their loyalty, and the sooner the better.

However, in case you think that Lieberman is alone in his demand for loyalty, you are pretty wrong. Here in Britain Lord Goldsmith, (yes the same Goldsmith who kindly offered Tony Blair a “legal” green light to invade Iraq in 2003) is also enthusiastic about loyalty.

“One American Jewess said she would be happy to send Palestinians away from ‘her’ land if they fail to swear an oath to Jewish primacy. Another Jewess admitted that when it comes to loyalty, Israel comes first while her motherland, Canada, comes second.”

 

Back in 2008 Goldsmith recommended the introduction of ceremonies for all school-leavers to mark "the passage from being a student of citizenship to an active citizen". He said he favoured an oath of allegiance to the Queen but the statement could alternatively be a pledge of loyalty to Britain.

 

Lord Goldsmith was quoted by the Independent as suggesting that Britain did not face a crisis of shared citizenship, but added that national pride had declined over the past 20 years, particularly among the young. He warned that “one third or more of black people did not identify with their home country”.

I guess that Goldsmith may be correct: there is a possible decline in British pride but this decline is not 20 years old. It is actually the direct outcome of some disastrous policies he himself was supposed to stop. What exactly Goldsmith is expecting our kids to be “proud of” or identify with? Is it the criminal wars he himself approved? Is it the fact that Britain doesn’t find the legal strength to deal with the people who dragged us into these wars and made us all complicit in a genocide?

The similarity between Lieberman and Goldsmith is pretty obvious. “One third or more of black people did not identify with their home country,” says Goldsmith. As with Lieberman, Goldsmith somehow knows in advance who may not pass the “loyalty test”. The image of an “inclusive policy” is there to enhance differences and marginalize minorities. Like Lieberman, Goldsmith at the time failed to suggest what the British values are. Instead, he reverted to symbolism and legalism as a substitute to ethical thinking.

The days of Israel are numbered; there is no way to rescue the Jewish state for it is founded on a tribal and racist ideology. However, Britain can still liberate itself of its neocon phase. All it has to do is to de-Zionize its political system and media. Instead of being loyal to states, we had better stay in tune with ethics and universalism. Instead of succumbing to moral interventionism, we just have to search in ourselves for moral guidance.


Gilad Atzmon is an Israel-born musician, writer and anti-racism campaigner. His latest jazz album is "The tide has turned”.

Source: Redress Information & Analysis (http://www.redress.cc). Material published on Redress may be republished with full attribution to Redress Information & Analysis (http://www.redress.cc)

tags: Peace Process / Direct Talks / Negotiations / Zoabi / Peace Talks / Netanyahu / Lieberman / Jewish State / Knesset / Marmara / Zionist / Goldstone / Gaza / Gaza Siege / Gaza War / Israeli Crimes / Iraq War / Israeli Settlement / Blair / / Gilad atzmon / Haneen Zoabi / Goldsmith /
Posted in Palestine  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Related Articles
MP Baraka: Lieberman’s call to eject Palestinians a denial of history, truth
Settlers build near Palestinian villages on eve of peace talks
Knesset committee recommends law set to arm more settlers
The Gaza Flotilla: How Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs Fakes Photos of Seized Weapons
BBC bias: the Gaza Freedom Flotilla
Gaza: a castle in the sand
Blair hit with shoes at pro-Palestinian demonstration in Dublin
Tony Blair’s bloody memoir
Mousa: Pessimism surrounds renewed negotiations with Israel
Rabbi Weiss Condemning recent statement of former Zionist so called “chief rabbi” Ovadiah Yosef
Once again peace talks or no peace talks
Iraq war dissenter Kelly’s postmortem report remains secret
Zionist settlers uproot 200 Palestinian olive trees
British Zionists target children’s paintings to minimize Israeli Gaza war crimes impact on UK public
Noam Chomsky: The Real Reasons the U.S. Enables Israeli Crimes and Atrocities
Hamas welcomes further UN investigation into the Goldstone report
Netanyahu rejects any preconditions for direct talks
IOF paints over Marmara ship to hide traces of assault
Netanyahu threatens to escalate military attacks on Gaza
UNCHR demands Israel to lift Gaza siege, let probe into its attack on Flotilla
Netanyahu refuses to extend settlement freeze
Assad, Oglu demand immediate end to Gaza siege
IHH announces more convoys to break Gaza siege
Lieberman proposes complete disengagement from Gaza
Direct or Indirect talks, what is the difference?
Rise people, rise: call for zero tolerance of Israeli crimes
Knesset to discuss law enabling it to remove Zoabi from her post
Zoughbi: The Israeli navy fired at Mavi Marmara before landing on its deck
Default Positions: U.S. immigration & Israeli settlements
Did Banned Media Report Foretell of Gaza War Crimes?
Supporting Goldstone without repudiating Israel, Zionism and Jewish collusion is cowardly
Hostage citizens and failed negotiations prompt parliament clashes
Why There Are No ‘Israelis’ in the Jewish State
Mansi: Israeli settlement expansion with American blessing
Netanyahu wants a piece of Palestine not peace
Israeli Knesset decides not to return confiscated Arab lands
The Litmus Test for the Legality of Iraq War
In response to Goldstone's report Israel submits details
Abbas admits failure of the peace process
U.S. Interests vs. The Jewish State
An Opportunity to Revive the Peace Process