Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Thu93 2020

Last update18:06 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Egypt’s 2010 Parliamentary Elections > Egypt’s 2010 Elections in the Western Media
Egypt Is Holding Elections: Will They Matter?
Egypt Is Holding Elections: Will They Matter?
will what transpires on election day actually matter much? We can probably predict the results. The ruling National Democratic Party, of course, will win enough seats to have a veto-proof two-thirds majority. But the real story will be the Muslim Brotherhood's neutralization.
Sunday, November 28,2010 20:16
by Shadi Hamid Huffington Post

 Tomorrow Egypt will hold hotly contested (but blatantly unfree) parliamentary elections. Policymakers and think tank analysts in Washington are paying close attention. Egypt, long the world's second largest recipient of U.S. aid, is the most populous Arab country and, unlike most its neighbors, has a peace treaty with Israel. The interest in the polls -- and growing concern over Egypt's stability -- is understandable.

But will what transpires on election day actually matter much? We can probably predict the results. The ruling National Democratic Party, of course, will win enough seats to have a veto-proof two-thirds majority. But the real story will be the Muslim Brotherhood's neutralization. With an unprecedented 88 seats in the outgoing parliament, the country's largest opposition group has been a major irritant for the regime. On Sunday, the group's numbers are expected to fall to a more manageable 20 to 30 seats. The liberal Wafd party, seen by much of the opposition as suspiciously close to the regime, will significantly increase its seat total and probably become the leader of the parliamentary opposition.

As unexciting as the results are likely to be, the elections are important for other reasons, particularly for what they tell us about the critical players in Egypt's uncertain future.

National Democratic Party. For the first time in recent memory, there are significant internal splits within the ruling coalition. As Islamist writer Ibrahim al-Houdaiby puts it, "there is no such thing as 'the regime' [anymore]." The disagreements revolve around presidential succession, with some party leaders favoring Gamal Mubarak to replace his ailing father, while others are searching for alternatives. These tensions have led to an unusually acrimonious candidate selection process within the NDP, with more than 3000 party members vying for 444 spots. To minimize internal squabbles, the NDP is running more than one candidate in more than 60 percent of districts. The contest, then, is between regime and opposition but also between the ruling party and itself.

Muslim Brotherhood. Over the past month, there have been increasing calls from within the Brotherhood to withdraw from the elections. A pro-boycott faction released a public statement disagreeing with the organization's decision to contest the polls. As I recently wrote here, mainstream Islamist groups are seriously questioning whether elections are the best mechanism for democratic change. In the 2007 Jordanian elections, the opposition Islamic Action Front (IAF) decided to participate against the wishes of many of its members. The result was the IAF's worst result ever, winning only 6 of 110 seats, due in part to unprecedented fraud. This strengthened pro-boycott voices, leading to the IAF's decision to boycott last month's parliamentary elections. Something similar may happen in Egypt, forcing Brotherhood supporters to consider alternative methods of contestation, including mass protest and civil disobedience.

Mohamed ElBaradei and the National Association for Change. The Muslim Brotherhood's ally, Nobel Prize winner and secularist politician, Mohamed El Baradei has been Egypt's most vocal supporter of a united opposition boycott. His call failed to persuade either the Brotherhood or the Wafd party. The Baradei campaign, despite gaining nearly 1 million signatures supporting its demands, appears increasingly aimless, again due partly to internal disagreements over strategy. Particularly dismal results on Sunday, or violence in the streets, may impress upon Baradei and his National Association for Change the need to re-assess and renew their efforts to translate support of a million Egyptians into sustained action on the ground. As we have seen in numerous cases, popular anger over election fraud can be a catalyst for a more confrontational opposition.

United States. On November 2nd, top National Security Council officials, including Dan Shapiro and Dennis Ross, met with the "Egypt working group," a bipartisan grouping of analysts and former officials who support increased U.S. pressure on Egypt. The Obama administration is reportedly reviewing its policy toward Egypt and seems to be putting greater emphasis on democracy. Rhetoric, as we learned during the Bush administration, can be helpful but becomes counterproductive absent the political will to change policy. Earlier this month, the State Department released a statement reiterated its "[support of] free and impartial elections in Egypt," while the U.S. ambassador to Egypt stated that "the United States remains committed to supporting free and fair elections in Egypt." Of course, the elections will be not be free, but they may prove even less free -- and perhaps more violent -- than observers expect. How, then, will the U.S. publicly, and privately, respond to Egypt's continued unwillingness to listen to or respect American admonitions?

A more aggressive U.S. response will not, by itself, be enough. But it will be critical. According to a 2008 study by Maria Stephan and Erica Chenoweth, international condemnation of regime repression is positively correlated with the success of nonviolent opposition activity. Opposition success, however, requires an opposition that is both unified and mobilized. On both counts, the Egyptian opposition has some ways to go.

Meanwhile, Guillermo O'Donnell and Philippe Schmitter, in their book Transitions from Authoritarian Rule, conclude that "there is no transition whose beginning is not the consequences -- direct or indirect -- of important divisions within the authoritarian regime itself." For this reason, the emerging divisions in the ruling NDP are worth watching closely. The elections (and post-election recriminations) are likely to exacerbate tensions between pro- and anti- Gamal camps.

In short, there are three moving parts in Egypt -- opposition, regime, and the United States -- and all of them are in flux. And what happens to each, in relation to the other, will determine the course Egypt takes in the troubled months and years ahead.


Follow Shadi Hamid on Twitter: www.twitter.com/shadihamid


tags: Egyptian Election / Egyptian Parliament / Ruling Regime / NDP / Gamal Mubarak / Mubarak / IAF / Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood / MB Candidate / Boycott Election / Boycott Election / Baradei / NAC / MB Detainees / Egyptian Opposition / / Moderate Muslim brotherhood / Moderate MB / People Assembly / Judicial System / Election 2005 / Egyptian Constitution / U.S. Aid / Islamic Action Front /
Posted in Egypt’s 2010 Elections in the Western Media  
Related Articles
Dr Morsy: Security Services Engaged in Systematic Violence against MB Candidates
Independent Coalition: Government Has Started Rigging Elections and HEC Speaks on Behalf of the Interior Ministry
Campaign Manager for MB Candidate in Hamul Abducted and Tortured
Five-Year-Old Killed During NDP Rally
Attempt to Burn the House of MB Candidate's Supporters and the Kidnap of Three
Countdown to Polls Reveals NDP Will Stop at Nothing
Egyptian Opposition’s Facebook Groups Disappear
Ruling NDP Files Complaints Against 52 MB Candidates
2010 Egyptian Elections – A Farce of Dragon Proportions
Dr Morsy to al-Arabiya: Supervision Is the Most Effective Means to Combat Rigging of the Elections
MB media spokesman: Group would secure at least 75 seats if there was no rigging
Mubarak Denies Tipping Bush on Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction
Mubarak's Son Denies Wanting Presidency
Mubarak assures integrity in elections amid doubts
The Elusive Myth of Democratic Egyptian Elections
ElBaradei: Democracy must come from within
MB MP: Alexandria's MB detainees transferred to security's headquarters
Amnesty calls on Egypt to free MB detainees
ElBaradei and the Mobilization of the Egyptian Diaspora
Is Gamal Mubarak the best hope for Egyptian democracy?
Egyptian Democracy Doesn’t Need Gamal Mubarak
Finding Meaning in the Egyptian Elections
Jordanian Government Fights Calls to Boycott Elections
Egyptian Opposition Announces Boycott of Upcoming Parliamentary Election
Is Gamal Mubarak the best hope for Egyptian democracy?
Ghad Party follows ElBaradei's lead to boycott election
MB offshoot in Jordan and National Unity Party to boycott elections
Jordan gov't accepts IAF boycott of elections but refuses to discuss electoral procedures
NAC Threatens to boycott elections if demands for guarantees against rigging defied
Egyptian citizens in the US demand right to vote in Egyptian elections
Submitted memo demands release of 191 political MB detainees
In Egypt, the Twilight of the Mubarak Regime
MB offshoot in Jordan the IAF ratify shura council poll results
The Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood: Islamist Participation in a Closing Political Environment
Amman: Possible division in IAF over election ban on new members
MB MPs excellent performance in the Egyptian Parliament
The Draft Party Platform of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood:
Democracy Gets Small Portion of U.S. Aid
Threat To Cut U.S. Aid Opens Rift With Egypt
Dunne: ‘Very Dramatic’ Achievement for Muslim Brotherhood in Egyptian Parliamentary Elections
Egypt: Mubarak Regime Cracks Down on Opposition