Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Tue109 2018

Last update19:14 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Opinions > Other Opinions
When Pro-Western Regimes Fall: What Should the U.S. Do?
When Pro-Western Regimes Fall: What Should the U.S. Do?
One month ago, Tunisia seemed quiet, stable. Quiet and stable is generally what Western governments like to see in the Middle East. But Tunisia may be on the brink of the first genuine Arab revolution in recent memory.
Thursday, January 13,2011 22:41
by Shadi Hamid Democracy Arsenal

One month ago, Tunisia seemed quiet, stable. Quiet and stable is generally what Western governments like to see in the Middle East. But Tunisia may be on the brink of the first genuine Arab revolution in recent memory. Talk of revolution tends to get US policymakers jittery, as it should. There is a lot at stake here. If Tunisia falls, it will likely embolden the opposition to pro-American regimes throughout the region. It already has, with solidarity rallies in a number of capitals and, more recently, a sort of awed fascination that what last month seemed impossible is, as we speak, happening. If change is going to happen, it's probably going to happen.

 There's only so much the US can do now that the ball has been rolling, with increasing speed, for 3 weeks (or depending on how you look at it more than 30 years). But it still can do something. And that something may make the difference in a delicate situation.

Some might argue that this is not about America but about Tunisians fighting for Tunisia. Accordingly, Obama and anyone else should just stay out of it. But the notion of democratic transitions as organic, homegrown – a post-Bush platitude – while technically true, is also misleading. What we know about democratic transitions suggests that Western support – in this case, the lack of it – can prove decisive. In their new book, noted political scientists Steve Levitsky and Lucan Way provide extensive empirical support to what many have long argued. They write, “It was an externally driven shift in the cost of suppression, not changes in domestic conditions, that contributed most centrally to the demise of authoritarianism in the 1980s and 1990s.”
'
The US may very well have limited leverage in Tunisia. But France and other EU nations have close relations with the Ben Ali regime. Tunisia depends on Europe for trade and tourism. So, first of all, the U.S. should be coordinating with its European allies. Maybe this wasn't so important yesterday. But now it is, and so it should call for serious, determined action on the part of the international community.

A phone call to President Ben Ali might be worth considering. Preferably tonight. Phone calls from American presidents to Arab autocrats do sometimes work, as the famed Bush-Mubarak call in 2005 did. What should Obama say? That, while the U.S. understands the security concerns involved, the U.S. will not tolerate the police/military shooting into crowds. And that any excessive loss of life will permanent damage Tunisia's relations with the West. For starters, the US could withdraw its ambassador in protest of mass killing (already around 50 are reported dead).

But some of this isn't about actual leverage, but optics. In the Arab world, perceptions sometimes matter more than reality. Protestors, after all, act not according some objective reality but to reality as they perceive it, in the moment. Here, the colored revolutions are instructive.

During Ukraine’s second round of elections in November 2004, President Bush sent Senator Richard Lugar as his special envoy. Lugar issued a forceful statement condemning President Leonid Kuchma’s government for election fraud. Soon after, Secretary of State Colin Powell refused to recognize the results and warned that “if the Ukrainian government does not act immediately and responsibly, there will be consequences for our relationship, for Ukraine’s hopes for a Euro-Atlantic integration, and for individuals responsible for perpetrating fraud.” The protestors in Maidan Square applauded when the Powell’s statement was read. Meanwhile, Lech Walesa, Poland’s first democratically elected president, assured the crowd that the West was on their side.

The West would be well-advised to show that, while it may not necessarily be on the side of the protestors (somewhat incredibly, Hillary Clinton already said the US won't take sides - talk about pre-emption), it will vigorously support their right to protest, assembly, and that it will not stand by while those fighting for freedom are shot to death. The protestors, who are, in fact, risking their lives, need to know that the world is watching. And that the world cares. This, presumably, is US policy, or maybe it used to be US policy. I'm not entirely sure. I do know, however, that President Bush said the following in his 2003 speech to the National Endowment for Democracy: "Militarism and rule by the capricious and corrupt are the relics of a passing era. We will stand with these oppressed peoples until the day of their freedom finally arrives.” I suppose this is the time to stand?

Of course, when Bush said this he put himself in a difficult position. How does one go about supporting both a regime and its opposition simultaneously? How does one take sides in such a fight? Morally speaking, there is a right side and a wrong side. Practically speaking, Ben Ali, however brutal, has been an "ally" for a considerable amount of time. This is why US policy in the Arab world has always struck me as fundamentally untenable in the long-run. Autocracies, to my knowledge, do not last forever. But we never took even preliminary steps of distancing ourselves from them, to prepare ourselves for the eventuality that they might fall. So now when tens of thousands of Arabs all across the region are stating, with unmistakable clarity, that they will no longer accept the authoritarian status quo, they are forcing us to take sides, testing our so-called "moral clarity." What they are really doing, I suspect, is forcing us to fall on the wrong side of history. This is not a good place to be.

Source

tags: Tunisia / Middle East / America / France / Europe / Mubarak / Obama / Arab World / Election / Fraud / Poland / Protestors / Western Governments / American Regimes / Bush / Ben Ali / International Community / Hillary Clinton / US Policy
Posted in Other Opinions , Democracy , Viva La Tunisia  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
freedoom and solidarity to the agypt people Jarumir
Our message to the protest movement: Actual decisions are taken in Washington DC, at the US State Department, at the Pentagon, at Langley, headquarters of the CIA. at H Street NW, the headquarters of the World Bank and the IMF. The relationship of "the dictator" to foreign interests must be addressed. Unseat the political puppets but do not forget to target the "real dictators". The protest movement should focus on the real seat of political authority; it should target the US embassy, the delegation of the European Union, the national missions of the IMF and the World Bank. Jarumir from Germany
Sunday, January 30,2011 16:08
What should the West do? tdub
Hopefully we in the US will fully support any freedoms and freedom from poverty and corruption. Most Americans are very proud of what the people have done in Egypt, etc, and only hope our government supports fully the desire for freedom.
Thursday, February 3,2011 02:38
WHEN NATIONS FALL RICHARD
WHEN THEY FALL WE SHOULD RIDE THE WORLD OF THE SCUM.......YES YOU
Saturday, February 12,2011 00:15
What should the Muslims do? Ilyas al Muslim
Well I guess the U.S. would have to find yet another fabricated lie to try to invade Muslim countries like they did with WMD in Iraq travesty LoL. But I only blame the Muslims for not standing up to that newly improved Rome. I don't blame the West for looking after their interest I blame Muslims for not looking for their own interest & for being weak.
Thursday, March 3,2011 16:27
Related Articles
Deafening Western Silence as Tunisia's Violence Escalates Despite Curfew
Egypt is Inflating Not Flourishing
Why Is the West Turning a Blind Eye to Tunis' Protest?
MB offshoot in Jordan to participate in planned protests against inflation
Wave of arrests of bloggers and activists
Will the Muslim Brotherhood Take Over?
Tunisia and Steps to Overthrow the Dictator Ben Ali
Tunisia : Arabic Pinochet Government Respond to Peaceful Protests by Live Ammunition Orchestrating AlJazeera and Seizing AlMowqef Newspaper
Egypt Ranks 98th in International Corruption
Update: WikiLeaks Cables On Muslim Brotherhood
An Interview on Freedom & Citizenship in Islam .
Human development report reveals Egypt ranks 101
Israel's Longstanding Middle East Plan
How Syria controls its dissidents
The Wrong Threat
Human Rights Council opens fifteenth regular session
The Arab Tomorrow
The Arab World’s Cultural Challenge
The Situation of Human Rights in Egypt 2009: Introduction, summary and recommendations
EOHR “Al-Shater and his companions should be released immediately”