Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Tue109 2018

Last update19:14 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Issues > Democracy
In Egypt, Democracy Is The Only Avenue To Economic Stability
In Egypt, Democracy Is The Only Avenue To Economic Stability
How the business world--and the U.S. government--should look at the protests.
Egypt's would-be revolution is causing not only a political earthquake, but an economic one as well.
Thursday, February 3,2011 03:12
by Shadi Hamid forbes.com

Egypt's would-be revolution is causing not only a political earthquake, but an economic one as well. On Friday, the Dow Jones Industrial average was down 166 points--the biggest one-day drop in nearly half a year. Oil prices shot up more than 4%. Keith Wirtz, chief investment officer at Fifth Third Asset Management warned of a 5% to 10% selloff in the coming weeks.

Up until recently, Egypt was hailed as a success story by international financial institutions. In 2008, the World Bank's Doing Business report named Egypt the world's top reformer. The technocratic government of Prime Minister Ahmed Nazif oversaw annual GDP growth of 5% to 7%. By shutting out any opposition, the Egyptian regime promised political stability and delivered impressive growth. Uncertainty is the enemy of markets, and the Arab authoritarian order seemed, if nothing else, to offer a certain reliability. The past few days, that certainty has proven illusory. Egypt will not go back to what it was. In the coming weeks, the country's economic situation will deteriorate further. On Thursday, the main index of the Egyptian stock market dropped 10.5%. Meanwhile, tourists are fleeing Egypt, and they're not likely to come back anytime soon.

But this isn't just about Egypt. This is about a regional architecture that is crumbling, and more rapidly than anyone had imagined. There have been unprecedented protests in Yemen and rejuvenated opposition in Jordan, another close U.S. ally and the second-largest per-capita recipient of American assistance. In other words, Tunisia and Egypt are part of a broader regional trend. If Egypt--considered to have a robust security apparatus--falls, then all bets are off elsewhere. Egyptians, after all, drew inspiration and energy from Tunisia's "Jasmine Revolution." Other countries will now draw inspiration from what has been the largest pro-democracy mobilization in the history of Egypt and perhaps the Arab world. It would be premature to predict a pan-Arab revolution. Revolutions, even in the best of times, are incredibly difficult to stage. But, for the first time, a region-wide movement toward democracy is within the realm of possibility.

The other regimes in question are important U.S. allies that have opened themselves up to Western business and investment, sometimes with impressive results. More important, with the world's largest reserves, they play a critical role in ensuring the free flow of oil. Saudi Arabia figures most prominently in such calculations. Its stock market, the region's largest, experienced a one-day drop of 6% in response to events in Egypt. And that was without any internal agitation. How much will it dip if Saudis start holding sit-ins?

Investors should be worried. And most of them already are. Accordingly, where the people have made clear their desire for change, the international community should do what it can to facilitate successful--and peaceful--democratic transitions. Tunisia, the country that provided the spark for the events of the past month, may very well still fall into chaos. Pro-democracy revolutions don't necessarily lead to democracy.

So the current phase of re-building the country's political institutions is crucial. In a country like Egypt, full-scale violence initiated by a fragile regime would undermine the little stability that remains. It may be the case that many in the business community, along with the Obama administration, would prefer to see the Egyptian regime remain in power, but under better behavior. This, however, does not seem to be a path the Egyptian people, led by a diverse and peaceful protest movement, are willing to take.

Democracy--with the accountability, popular legitimacy and peaceful resolution of conflict it so often brings--is the only avenue to long-term stability. Otherwise, authoritarian regimes will appear stable--until they're not. And, by then, it's too late.

Source

tags: Egypt / Egyptian Democracy / Democracy in Egypt / Egyptian Government / Egyptian Regime / Protests / Jordan / Tunisia / Saudi Arabia / Mubarak Regime / Revolution / Prime Minister / Ahmed Nazif / Yemen / Jasmine Revolution / Egyptian People / Human Rights in Egypt / Day of Rage / 25 January
Posted in Democracy , Other Opinions  
Add Comment Send to Friend Print
Democracy Akram
Asalam-o-Alaikum, I take my hat off to my Egyptian brothers and sisters who have challanged this repressive regime so bravely persistently for the last few days,and continue to do so,and I wish them all the success in their endeavours for democracy. I would like to share some of my opinions regarding democractic systems. Currently two of the most popular democratic systems throughout the world are; Presidential system,and Parliamentarian system. In Presidential system,you have a president,who is the head of the state,whereas in the Parliamentarian system,the head of the state is known as a Prime minister. In my view,in the Presidential system there are some elements which make it more prone to the President becoming much more powerful,and keeping in view the recent history,it may lead to the rule of one man,which in turn may result in dictatorship. The Parliamentarian system,however on the other hand,relies heavily on the cabinet,and the parliament,and the prime minister is not an all powerful figure,who has to always keep into consideration the views of his cabinet,and the paliament,and due to that,is relatively a lot less likely to result in a one man rule.Therefore I would like to suggest that in any future talks in regards to a future democratic governing system,the opposition should insist upon a parliamentarian system for Egypt and not a presidential system. Besides,the word \"PRESIDENT\" has become almost synonymous with dictatorship in the middle east,and has been polluted due to all the repressive regimes in the middle east.
Thursday, February 3,2011 04:48
suggestion Euskipt
Please, take into consideration a real democratic solution. Elections just as western world knows them, aren't democratic at all. Real democracy stands for EVERY DECISSION be taken by ALL CITIZENS. If you can achieve that, you'll be the head of a new world. I'll respect and admire you.
Friday, February 4,2011 16:57
Related Articles
Human Rights Calls for the Dismissal of the Minister of Interior and Senior Leadership of the Police
Egypt Protests – Changing the Rules of the Game
MB statement on January 25, Day of Rage and its consequences
Day of Rage Digest Egyptians in Action January 25th
Egypt's unstable regime
Egypt Revolution – In the Shadow of Tunisia
MB Youth, January 25 Activists Hope it Will Be the Start of Significant Change
Egypt's Day of Rage a Day of Revolution
Security Threats for Activists Hours before the Egyptian Day of Rage
Politicians: January 25 Demonstration Is not a Prelude to National Uprising
MB Group’s Youths to Participate and Respect Group’s Regulations
Political Forces in Egypt Preparing for the January 25 Day of Rage Demonstration
MB Chairman Confirms Group Will Take Part in Day of Rage March Despite Threats
ElBaradei supports Day of Rage march but will not participate
Church Calls on Copts to Boycott Day of Rage
Expatriate Egyptians announce participation on Jan 25th Rage Day
Depriving 6th April Detainees From Food
Briefing Request on Arrests and Assaults of the Day of Rage
Lawyer To File Report Against Torture of Ain Shams Students
It’s Time for Change on “the Day of Rage”