Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website

Thu93 2020

Last update18:06 PM GMT

Back to Homepage
Font Size : 12 point 14 point 16 point 18 point
:: Opinions > Other Opinions
Why the Muslim Brotherhood Are Egypt's Best Democrats
Why the Muslim Brotherhood Are Egypt's Best Democrats
After the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003, many Western commentators were surprised by the ease with which Iraq's religious movements adapted to multiparty democracy.
Wednesday, June 22,2011 01:20
by Bobby Ghosh globalspin.blogs.time

After the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003, many Western commentators were surprised by the ease with which Iraq's religious movements adapted to multiparty democracy. The Shi'ite groups, in particular, were quick to organize into political parties, set up grass-roots organizations across the country and form practical coalitions ahead of elections. Long assumed to be ideologically opposed to democracy, these groups showed they were in fact brilliantly adaptable. Their leaders, despite having little experience in kissing babies, campaigned like seasoned pros.

In contrast, Iraq's liberal parties were rank amateurs. Their leaders, despite having spent decades in exile in Western democracies (whereas most Islamist exiles were confined to places like Iran and Syria), seemed not to understand how democracy works: people like Iyad Allawi and Ahmed Chalabi had an air of entitlement, assuming that people would vote for them merely because they were modern, progressive and famous. They didn't bother to create a national party infrastructure, nor did they care to campaign. Instead, they held all-day salons in the manner of medieval monarchs giving audience to the elite.

Something very similar is unfolding in Egypt. Of all the political groups to have emerged since the fall of Hosni Mubarak — including the myriad youth movements, secular parties, leftists and remnants of the old National Democratic Party — the Muslim Brotherhood seem to have the best understanding of how democracy works. The Islamist group may have taken a backseat to the liberal youth movement that brought down the dictator, but it has wasted little time in preparing for the post-Mubarak era. Although the generals in charge of Egypt's transition have not yet announced a date for the parliamentary elections (which are expected in the fall), the Brotherhood is already campaigning vigorously, in Cairo and the countryside. The youth movement, on the other hand, seems unable to break out of protest mode.

(PHOTOS: Portraits of the Revolutions in the Arab World)

The gap between the two sides was exposed in a mid-March referendum on constitutional reforms. The Brotherhood mobilized a massive "yes" vote to ensure that any meaningful reforms would take place after the parliamentary elections. The liberals were split, unsure as to which scenario they feared more: a constitution written by a military-appointed panel before the elections, or one written by a Brotherhood-dominated parliament afterward. It was a rout: 77% voted yes.

The gap has not closed. Since the referendum, many liberals have sought to undermine the result by trying to force through reforms before the elections. Their great champion, former U.N. nuclear watchdog (and Nobel laureate) Mohamed ElBaradei, argues that the constitution can't wait for people's elected representatives. The youth leaders agree and are threatening to return to Tahrir Square if they don't get their way. They claim the referendum doesn't matter because the Brotherhood misled Egyptians by portraying it as a vote on religion. (The Islamists deny this, and some neutral observers say both sides played fast and loose with the facts.)

This carping makes the liberals look like sore losers, and far from democratic. Critics accuse them of trying to buy time: a postponement in the elections would give liberals more time to get their political house in order and hopefully catch up with the Brotherhood's organizational lead. Even Alaa al-Aswany, a novelist and strong Brotherhood critic, acknowledges that it ill behooves the liberals to attempt an end run around the referendum. "The people made a choice, and we have to respect it," he says.

The Brotherhood, meanwhile, is sitting pretty. It has offered to form a broad coalition with liberals and leftists in the elections, and promises that there will be no attempt to hijack the constitutional reform process afterward. "The new constitution has to be written by all Egyptians," says Essam Erian, a top Brotherhood leader. "No one group should have a louder voice than the others." This makes the Islamists look responsible and conciliatory, and is likely to play well with voters. (See more on the Brotherhood's election strategy in posts to come.)

In Iraq, it took the liberals years to catch up with the religious parties in organizational and campaigning skills. In the last election, Allawi finally cobbled together a coalition that won more seats than any other group, only to be outmaneuvered by postelection horse trading. If Egypt's liberals aren't careful, a similar fate awaits them.



tags: Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt / Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood / Egyptian Democracy / Iraq / Islamist / Iran and Syria / Mubarak / NDP / ElBaradei / Tahrir / Egyptians / El Erian / Moderate Muslim Brotherhood / Moderate MB / Saddam Hussein / Political Parties / Elections / Democracy in Egypt / Liberal Parties / Political Groups / National Democratic Party / Mubarak Era / Parliamentary Elections / Constitution / Tahrir Square / Essam El Erian
Posted in Other Opinions , MB Understanding  
Muslim brotherhood Guirguis
who on earth is Bobby Ghosh and why is he allowed to write this ill informed rubbish. Does he not know that Islam and democracy are incompatible.It is possible for a Muslim country to live in peace and prosperity, not under Islamic law, but under a secular government and law. Please publish reports from informed individuals not nitwits who cheer every time they hear the word democracy. Just having the vote is not democracy. Remenber the vote on constiutional reform. Green cards for yes Black for no. Out of the 14 Million who voted how many Muslims would use black over green. 14 ou of 84 millions. Democracy; give me a break. Rule of Law, yes. Human rights to all yes. Under the Muslim brotherhood? It will never happen.
Thursday, July 21,2011 01:32
salam aizu
Aparisim "Bobby" Ghosh is a journalist and TIME Magazine's World Editor.[1] An Indian national, he is the first non-American to be named World Editor in TIME's more than 80 years
Wednesday, August 31,2011 09:43
Related Articles
Egypt Elections Expose Divisions in Muslim Brotherhood
MB Shura Council Dismisses Abul Fotouh
Egyptians' Raised Standards May Be Stumbling Block
Slovakia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Downplays Concerns of MB in Power
MB to Meet Orthodox Pope to Bridge Gaps
National Security Agency Vows to Protect Citizens
Uncertainty and optimism in Egypt
MB Leadership Boycotts "Unprofessional" Al-Masry Al-Youm Newspaper
National Coalition for Egypt Set Up
German Official: MB is an Asset to Egypt’s Upcoming Phase
MB Chairman: All Are Obliged to Protect the Revolution
Syrian MB Statement on Israeli Broadcast
FJP Leader Wishes Salafi Party Well
Turkey's Military Intervention in Syria
FJP and Wafd to Coordinate Candidacy List
El-Erian to Political Parties: Win Votes Then Discuss Power‏
MB Deputy Chairman: Patience and Solidarity Are Keys to Revolution's Success
FJP Holds First Conference Advocating Unity
MB in Jordan Embarks on Fresh Protests
MB Chairman Reiterates Calls to Rekindle Revolution’s Tolerant Spirit